Genetic Archaeology
Recent News |  Archives |  Tags |  About |  Newsletter |  Submit News |  Links |  Subscribe to GeneticArchaeology.com RSS Fee Subscribe

Student's Discovery Could Help Rewrite Prehistory (8/13/2007)

Tags:
humans, american indians, migration

When UD doctoral student Darrin Lowery was 6, he and his father began collecting arrowheads and spearheads that they found along the shoreline of Tilghman Island in the Chesapeake Bay. They may have turned up archeological evidence that the earliest Native Americans came from Europe, not Asia. - Photo Credit: Darrin Lowery
When UD doctoral student Darrin Lowery was 6, he and his father began collecting arrowheads and spearheads that they found along the shoreline of Tilghman Island in the Chesapeake Bay. They may have turned up archeological evidence that the earliest Native Americans came from Europe, not Asia. - Photo Credit: Darrin Lowery
A little boy's natural curiosity may have turned up archeological evidence that the earliest Native Americans came from Europe, not Asia.

When UD doctoral student Darrin Lowery was 6, he and his father began collecting arrowheads and spearheads that they found along the shoreline of Tilghman Island in the Chesapeake Bay. "We found some interesting things, but we didn't know what they were," Lowery said.

These artifacts remained interesting curiosities until the late 1970s when Lowery and his father were watching "The Search for the First American," a television program about the first inhabitants of North America. During the broadcast, Dennis Stanford, chairperson of the National Museum of Natural History's anthropology department, showed a Clovis point, or fluted spearhead made of stone, used as a hunting tool at the end of the last ice age about 11,000 years ago and named after the first of its kind discovered in Clovis, N.M., in 1932. Clovis tools have rock spear points, are thin and bifacial and share "overshot" flaking characteristics that make wide, flat blades.

After watching the program, Lowery said he told his father he had Clovis points in his collection, but the senior Lowery was skeptical. "My father wondered why someone during the ice age was living on what is now Tilghman Island," Lowery said. At that time, Clovis points were mostly found in the west, and anthropologists believed they were used by hunters who migrated from Siberia to Alaska across the Bering Strait.

Then, when Lowery was 13, he and his sister went to a conference in Washington, D.C., where Stanford was speaking. Lowery brought along his collection, and when he had the opportunity, he approached Stanford. Lowery said Stanford was astonished that these artifacts had been gathered in Maryland and began excavating on Tilghman Island almost immediately.

Stanford found that Tilghman Island's Clovis points were older than those found in New Mexico--about 2,000 years older. Since then, a site discovered more recently near Richmond, Va., has yielded Clovis points that may be 17,000 years old.

After years of excavating in Alaska and finding little evidence of Clovis technology and with the abundance of Clovis tools found in Virginia, Delaware and other parts of the East Coast, Stanford and others have become proponents of the Solutrean theory, which holds that some Native Americans migrated from Europe by boat. Other theories contend that all Native Americans came from Asia.

The Solutrean theory is based on the assumption that hunters, living in prehistoric Europe (now France and Spain) approximately 21,000-17,000 years ago, traveled to North America looking for game and brought their methods of making stone tools with them, providing the foundation for later Clovis technology found throughout North America. The theory rests on the similarities in Solutrean and Clovis tools that have no known counterparts before 11,200 in eastern Asia, Siberia or the Bering Strait.

While Lowery is still involved with the Tilghman Island excavation, his field of doctoral research in geological sciences at UD is geoarcheology. Under the supervision of Michael O'Neal, assistant professor of geography and geological sciences, Lowery is studying how landscape changes through time. That was the subject of his master's degree research at Temple University.

Lowery's interest is in how geological formations reveal weather patterns and how these weather patterns affect human development.

He said his excavations on Tilghman Island show evidence that around 12,900 years ago, it suddenly got really cold and dry. "In 20-50 years, it went from a mild climate to almost full glacial conditions. There were a lot of Clovis occupations before 13,000 years, but after that this area becomes a no-man's land," Lowery said.

"In today's world we talk about global warming and cooling, but the best way to understand the impact of climate is to look at the past," he said.

Lowery, who works as a survey archeologist, co-teaches a six-week field school at Washington College in Chestertown, Md. The course, for college students interested in archeology, is targeted at locations in Kent County, Md. Their research will help test a model aimed at locating prospective archeological sites on the upper Eastern Shore of Maryland. The model predicts areas Native Americans were most likely to have inhabited. If the model proves accurate, archeologists will have a head start in identifying historically sensitive areas.

Excavations along the East Coast are revealing important information about the origins of the first Americans, especially, the 20-acre Tilghman Island site that Lowery once owned. He sold it to the Eastern Shore Land Conservancy, a private, nonprofit organization working for sound land-use planning on Maryland's Eastern Shore. The sale protected the site from development, securing it for archeological research.

Lowery said that the Tilghman Island site still has much to reveal, and now, its protected status will give scientists the time they need to dig deeper.

Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued by the University of Delaware

Comments:

1. Steve Krause

9/1/2007 12:34:05 PM MST

There seem to be some major unresolved problems with the Solutrean theory: There is a size difference between Solutrean and Clovis points, there seems to be a major gap in time between Solutrean artifacts and Clovis artifacts, there is no evidence of a sea voyage from Europe to America in the stone age or even evidence of Solutrean water navigation abilities, and there isn't any obvious genetic hint of such a migration. All these problems may ultimately be resolved, but for now the Solutrean theory seems not to be based on any evidence, but simply on an observation that two distant groups made similar spear points and a desperate desire to believe such a migration occurred.


2. Jess

9/4/2007 4:04:04 PM MST

People seem to forget that a lot of the theories we now regard as close to fact at one point rested on as little evidence as the Solutrean theory apparently does, according to Steve. But the truth is that more evidence points to the Solutrean theory than any "desperate desire". The growing evidence of earlier and earlier carbon dates, for example, lends evidence to the idea that the first Americans were here a LOT earlier than we ever thought possible. Sites such as those in Chile and Virginia lend evidence that there were people here before 15,000 years ago. Yet the land bridge theory, until recently, rested on the narrow window of opportunity that people could have used to crossover from Asia. Taking that a step further, the amount of years between the Solutrean of France and Spain, and the Clovis of the new world, could simply be due to undiscovered sites or problems with dating. At this point too, dates earlier than about 17,000 years are dismissed as mistakes, problems with dating techniques, or wishful thinking on the part of the site archaeologists. 5 years ago, the now accepted date of 15,000 years was met with the same attitude.

As for the problem of water navigation, people of the past simply aren't given enough credit until the evidence is overwhelming. Even today, archaeologists still view these cultures as "primitive" and unable to innovate or fulfill their needs beyond what the archaeological records show. Unfortunately, I doubt it will ever show boats or navigational records simply because these things would most likely be made of materials that wouldn't last the ages. Hide, wood, hemp and rope, etc.

As for genetics, I don't see why more than one theory can't hold water at the same time, just as I can't see why more than one people can't get to the continent at the same time. Anything could have happened in the years we have little to no information about. Find a skeleton in Maine that dates from that time, with genetics that point to Asia rather than Europe, then start harping on the genetics. Until then, there is simply not enough evidence to conclude anything. That's my biggest annoyance with archaeologists. In the end, that's why I chose cultural anthropology. All the cultures I deal with are alive.


3. Neal

9/6/2007 8:43:40 AM MST

Regarding the previous comment about the lack of genetic evidence to support the Solutrean Theory, there remains the problem of the unresolved origin of haplogroup X2 in Native Americans.


4. Kevin

9/11/2007 9:24:29 AM MST

I don't know the evidence very well, but recently there was a show on the Discovery Channel talking about this and they do get into genetic evidence that was only recently discovered. There was an attempt to identify the genetic markers of a large eastern tribe of natives in Canada that found a large dispersal of European genetic markers. According to the show, the degree to which the markers had disseminated through the population is simply not possible without several thousand years.

My apologies for not being able to cite the show or tribe. As I said, I'm just not familiar enough with the information.


5. Dennis Kramer

3/9/2008 4:34:02 PM MST

Stumbled upon your web site...You present things I am interested in. Would like to know more about you.


Leave a Reply:

Search

Recent Articles
Mathematician finds humanity was genetically divided for as much as 100,000 years 5/16/2008

Ancient protein offers clues to killer condition 5/13/2008

Worldwide platypus study tracks 160 million years 5/9/2008

The cooperative view: New evidence suggests a symbiogenetic origin for the centrosome 5/8/2008

Animal interaction behind 'Cambrian Explosion'? 5/7/2008

8 new human genome projects offer large-scale picture of genetic difference 5/1/2008

Protein Sequences from T. rex Collagen Show Evolutionary Relationships of Dinosaurs 4/26/2008

Dawn of human matrilineal diversity 4/25/2008

Researchers find dinosaur clues in fat 4/24/2008

Clues To Ancestral Origin Of Placenta Emerge In Genetics Study 4/18/2008

The first humans went to America earlier than was thought 4/16/2008

When Genetics And Geology Meet In Patagonia 4/14/2008

Ancient DNA: reconstruction of the biological history of Aldaieta necropolis 4/12/2008

And the First Animal on Earth Was a ... 4/11/2008

Meteorites delivered the 'seeds' of Earth's left-hand life 4/10/2008

  Archives |  Submit News |  Advertise With Us |  Contact Us |  Links
All contents © 2000 - 2009 Web Doodle, LLC. All rights reserved.