Genetic Archaeology
Recent News |  Archives |  Tags |  About |  Newsletter |  Submit News |  Links |  Subscribe to GeneticArchaeology.com RSS Fee Subscribe
New Articles
Scientists develop new method to investigate origin of life 9/6/2008

DNA shows that last woolly mammoths had North American roots 9/5/2008

Researchers find 'junk DNA' may have triggered 9/5/2008

New research challenges long-held assumptions of flightless bird evolution 9/4/2008

Researchers locate geographic origins from DNA 9/3/2008

'Armoured' Fish Study Helps Strengthen Darwin's Natural Selection Theory 8/29/2008

Genome of simplest animal reveals ancient lineage, confounding array of complex capabilities 8/25/2008

Genetics reveals big fish that almost got away 8/24/2008

Exploding chromosomes fuel research about evolution of genetic storage 8/23/2008

Tahitian vanilla originated in Maya forests, says botanist 8/22/2008

Research touches a nerve 8/21/2008

Molecular sleuths track evolution through the ribosome 8/20/2008

Nine To Twenty Individual Fire Ant Queens Started U.S. Fire Ant Population 8/17/2008

How DNA Repairs Can Reshape Genome, Spawn New Species 8/15/2008

Study reveals surprising details of the evolution of protein translation 8/13/2008

Man's Best Friend Lends Insight Into Human Evolution (4/15/2007)

Tags:
evolution, dogs

Flexibly drawing inferences about the intentions of other individuals in order to cooperate in complex tasks is a basic part of everyday life that we humans take for granted. But, according to evolutionary psychologist Brian Hare at the Max Planck Institute in Germany, this ability is present in other species as well.

As Hare discusses in the April issue of Current Directions in Psychological Science, chimpanzees utilize social cues like eye gaze and face orientation to monitor others’ behavior or infer motives of other subordinate or dominant individuals, or even deceive them, when competing for food. But it turns out that chimps are not very good at drawing inferences about others’ mental states in cooperative situations — such as when an experimenter (or another chimp) helpfully points to hidden food. This is a skill that humans already display in infancy, and according to Hare it seems to have evolved since the human lineage split from that of chimps a few million years ago.

For Hare, who has worked with a number of different animal species, to understand the "unique" human ability to use social cues cooperatively we should look not just at our closest animal relatives, but also at our best animal friends. While chimps may fail to infer others’ mental states when cooperating, domestic dogs do quite well at such tasks. If you point to hidden food, dogs often grasp what you are trying to tell them. Puppies even do it without prior training, indicating that it is an innate ability, not simply one they acquire through contact with their owners.

What accounts for this piece of convergent evolution between humans and domestic dogs is nothing other than the process of domestication — the breeding of dogs to tolerate, rather than fear, human company.

According to Hare, domesticated dogs’ ability to solve social problems may have emerged once the brain systems mediating fear were altered — and the same thing may have occurred in human evolution. Chimps, he says, are constrained in solving cooperative problems by their impulse to fear more dominant individuals and behave aggressively toward more subordinate ones.

"Taken together," Hare writes, "the results on chimpanzee cooperation and their use of social cues support the hypothesis that evolution in human social problem solving, much like that of dog social problem solving, occurred after changes in our species’ social emotions lifted social constraints."

Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued by the Association for Psychological Science

Post Comments:

Search

  Archives |  Submit News |  Advertise With Us |  Contact Us |  Links
All contents © 2000 - 2009 Web Doodle, LLC. All rights reserved.