Lactose tolerance gene proves Natural Selection in humans (2/7/2007)
This unassuming gene, may be the strongest genetic evidence that Darwin's natural selection has occurred (and still does occur) in humans.
In a recent paper by Dr. Sarah Tishkoff with the University of Maryland, and others titled "Convergent adaptation of human lactase persistence in Africa and Europe", they describe the results of work collecting and analyzing several gene variants that are the key to the ability for adults to drink milk.
In most people, the ability to digest lactose, the main carbohydrate in milk, declines rapidly after weaning. It is caused by the decrease in production of an enzyme called lactase-phlorizin hydrolase (LPH). LPH breaks down lactose into glucose and galactose, sugars that are easily absorbed in the bloodstream and provide energy.
Descendants from populations that practiced cattle domestication, maintain the ability to digest milk and other dairy products into adulthood. These individuals have the lactase persistence trait.
Previous research had identified the gene in Europeans responsible for the lactase persistence. Dr. Tishkoff's research was based around determining whether Africans with the same lactase persistence trait had the same gene.
She studied several groups of people in Africa by testing their DNA. She also administered a bloodsugar test after having the subject ingest 50 grams of lactose. The intent was to determine how effective the person's body was at absorbing the lactose. She then categorized them based on whether they were lactose persistent, meaning could convert lactose into glucose easily, lactose intermediate persistence, meaning they could convert lactose into glucose somewhat, and lactose non-persistent, meaning they couldn't convert lactose at all.
| Region | % of Population Lactose Tolerant | Age of Gene | Age of Domestication of Cattle |
| West Africa | 5 to 20% | 6000 to 7000 years ago | 7700 to 9000 years ago |
| Africa | 26 to 88 % | 2700 to 6800 years ago | 3300 to 4500 years ago |
| Southern Europe | 50% | 8000 to 9000 years ago | 8000 Years Ago |
| Northern Europe | 90% | 2000 to 20000 years ago | 8000 Years Ago |
She then cross referenced the two sets of data, to determine which genes were responsible for the lactose persistence, and to what level. Her study, shows that the lactase persistence gene that has evolved in Africa has evolved independently of the gene variants predominant in Europe. So far she has identified 6 different variants of the gene.
She also discovered that individuals with one of the genes actually converted lactose into sugar much better and faster than the others.
In addition to lactose testing, she also cross referenced the results with whether the people being tested were descended from people who traditionally practiced cattle domestication. In most of the cases, if a person was descended from a family that practiced cattle domestication, they would have some level of lactose persistence.
In one unique case, the Hadza population of Tanzania who are hunters and gatherers can convert about 50% of the lactose they ingest into glucose, suggesting that either the Hadza descend from a pastoralist population or that the lactase persistence trait may be adaptive for something other than milk.
Positive Selection from Lactose Persistence
Dr. Tishkoff's research clearly showed that the lactose tolerance gene is linked to people who have practiced cattle domestication. But why is this important? The ability to digest milk is likely to increase a persons chance at survival because of the increased nutritional benefits of milk (carbohydrates as well as fats, protein and calcium). Milk is also an important source of water in arid regions, devoid of water.
When you consider that the symptoms of lactose intolerance include water loss from diarrhea, people that can digest milk have a big advantage over those that can't. Dr. Tishkoff's research also clearly indicates that because this is such a useful trait, its recent and rapid spread is an excellent example of the ongoing adaptation of humans.
Written By Branden Long, Web Doodle, LLC
Comments:
| 1. |
Alleagra Studena |
2/7/2007 1:04:42 PM MST |
A shoddily written piece with five elementary grammatical mistakes but which describes important & fascinating content. You are a professional journalist?
1.
"to determine which gene's where responsible for the"
You mean 'which genes were responsible'
2.
"She also discovered that individuals with one of the gene's actually converted lactose into sugar much better and faster than the others."
The plural of gene is genes not gene's.
3.
"how effective the persons body... "
Here you do need an apostrophe!
as in 'Person's body'.
4.
"increase a persons chance at survival "
Again, you make the same mistake.
5.
"it's recent and rapid spread"
You mean 'its recent and ....'.
|
| 2. |
Branden |
2/7/2007 1:19:02 PM MST |
Thank you Alleagra Studena. I was so excited to post this article, I didn't have it reviewed by my editor. I'll not do that again. -B |
| 3. |
JB |
2/7/2007 2:11:34 PM MST |
You also botched "people in Africa by testing there DNA." It should be "their" DNA. Not very professional. |
| 4. |
Richard |
2/7/2007 6:41:19 PM MST |
'its recent and rapid spread' is correct
its is the possessive pronoun
it's is the contraction of it is
just like his and hers don't have apostrophes either, and all contractions do.
|
| 5. |
Russell |
2/7/2007 7:04:14 PM MST |
Talk about not seeing the forest for the trees!
Thankyou for reporting on this study, it's this sort of human-relevant evidence that may help convince some that evolution is more than 'just one of a number of theories'.
Kudos for getting it out on Reddit, too.
|
| 6. |
Alix |
4/29/2007 12:05:24 AM MST |
Alleagra Studena! You need to get a life. This is an interesting article and I think it is exceptionally rude of you to go on about the grammar.
Thank you to the author, the grammatical errors do not affect the article in the slightest!
|
| 7. |
Ian H |
6/2/2007 6:05:26 AM MST |
AS you're obviously a frustrated, non-published 'intellectual' who has nothing better to do with his time. Get over yourself and see the importance of the article and not your own anal nit-picking.
Ian H
|
| 8. |
tina |
7/24/2007 5:58:46 AM MST |
Don't you think it is inaccurate to study these groups together. People from Africa and Asia don't consume near as much lactose as Europeans, therefore, they would have less tolerance for it. I don't think you can prove "natural selection" by one's tolerance to digest lactose!! |
| 9. |
Branden |
7/26/2007 4:57:27 PM MST |
Tina, I think you've missed the point. The people who've gained the lactase persistence gene have done so BECAUSE they and their ancestors were drinking milk. |
| 10. |
Professor Langdon |
5/13/2008 12:00:37 PM MST |
Branden is right, tina hasn't got the point. The afrcians and asians have less ability to digest lactose because they were not drinking milk so there was no need for that gene to stay fully active. How else do you think natural selection works? |
Leave a Reply:
|