Human Neanderthal Interbreeding (11/8/2006)
Researchers with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and the University of Chicago have published a paper
in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, that provides circumstantial evidence that humans and
Neanderthals interbred at some point in history.
Neanderthals and humans lived side by side in Europe for tens of thousands of years. Physiologically Neanderthals
were very similar to humans (see picture). Recent archaeological
evidence at Gorham's Cave suggests that Humans and Neanderthals may have even lived in the same caves together.
Neanderthals died out about 35,000 years ago for some unknown reason. Some scientists have suggested that they
interbred with humans, and "bred" themselves out of existence. Others have suggested that there high protein diet
forced them to hunt animals like the wholly mammoth and wholly rhino into extinction thus eliminating there primary
source of food.
Bruce Lahn, a Howard Hughes Medical Institute researcher at the University of Chicago who led the study said
"Finding evidence of mixing is not all that surprising. But our study demonstrates the possibility that interbreeding
contributed advantageous variants into the human gene pool that subsequently spread."
Mr. Lahn's team found a gene that regulates brain size to have entered the human genome about 1.1 million years ago,
and that it's modern form, or allele, appeared about 37,000 years ago, right before the Neanderthals went missing.
The gene microcephalin (MCPH1) it thought to control brain size while in the womb.
The gene also shows signs that it has experienced positive selection. Positive selection happens when a gene passed
on some advantage, to that the people who had it were more likely to reproduce than people who didn't have the gene.
Mr. Lahn's team estimated that 70 percent of all people living today have this gene.
Mr. Lahn also said "By no means do these findings constitute definitive proof that a Neanderthal was the source of
the original copy of the D allele. However, our evidence shows that it is one of the best candidates,"
The researchers came to their conclusions by performing statistical analysis of the DNA sequence that contains
microcephalin, which is known to regulate brain size in humans. Mutations in the human gene cause the brain to
develop much smaller than normal, in a condition called microcephaly. By tracking these mutations the researchers
could determine the date of the original genetic variant to 37,000 years ago.
They also noted that this D allele is very common in Europe, where the Neanderthals lived, and is more rare in
Africa, where they did not. Though the evidence is circumstantial at best, research on the
Neanderthal genome should be able to clear things up.
Comments:
| 1. |
Larry G. Fisher |
2/3/2007 10:56:45 PM MST |
Hi,
Not enough has been made of the cross-pollenation of cultures between Neanderthals and Humans, if they lived closely together for some 20,000 yrs.Neanderthals adapted well to their environment for 200,000 yrs. we as humans being new comers to frozen-cold Europe may have learned some survival skills from these long time inhabitants?Whats the most recent carbon dating on Neanderthals from extreme Western Europe?how does that dna compare to the oldest Neanderthal dna markers etc.?Funny, if the Neanderthals we're maybe the first out of Africa some 200,000 yrs. ago?why did they only head north by northwest toward Europe,while the Australian Abogegenies only headed East?What would have caused the geonetic split between Neanderthals from Humans all still in Africa 500,000 yrs. ago?Is Dr. Spencer Wells involved in Neanderthal DNA research?
Please reply, Thankyou,
Larry Fisher
Boise, idaho
Please reply.
|
| 2. |
Rewi Kemp |
3/30/2007 9:20:53 PM MST |
1) We now have a cave on Gibralter and a southern Spain site with carbon dates for Neandertal at 24000 yrs BP.
2) Since when did humans interact without bonking one another?
3) As Neanderthals were able to survive for 200k yrs in Europe before Sapiens obviously they were either smarter or tougher or both.
|
| 3. |
Dorothy George |
5/10/2007 3:46:02 PM MST |
It's not whether they bonked each other, it's whether the bonking produced offspring that themselves could produce offspring. Cf. the sterile mule, the offspring of a horse and a donkey. |
| 4. |
Rewi Kemp |
10/2/2007 9:02:34 PM MST |
Very true, however if you take bonks (say 100/yr - very low for pre-TV) x area say 3000 sq km x 1000 sq km x people/sq km (say 5 - very low even for hunters) x 10,000 yrs divided by fraction of population fertile (50% ?)
divided by fraction mixing (say 5%) = 37,500,000,000,000 tries.
|
Leave a Reply:
|
|